LIVE
⭐1.95M influencer listings 🏢30.9K sponsor listings 🌍51.76B combined audience reach 📊13 platforms indexed 🗺️130+ countries covered 🏷️10,000+ niches 🟣694.1K Twitch creators 🦋578.9K Bluesky creators 🎙️304.9K podcast creators 🐘141.1K Mastodon creators ▶️71.9K YouTube creators 🥊64.3K Kick creators ✈️47.1K Telegram creators 𝕏30.9K X creators 🎵15.2K TikTok creators 🎮5.1K Discord creators 🎬3.1K Rumble creators 🧵1.2K Threads creators ⭐1.95M influencer listings 🏢30.9K sponsor listings 🌍51.76B combined audience reach 📊13 platforms indexed 🗺️130+ countries covered 🏷️10,000+ niches 🟣694.1K Twitch creators 🦋578.9K Bluesky creators 🎙️304.9K podcast creators 🐘141.1K Mastodon creators ▶️71.9K YouTube creators 🥊64.3K Kick creators ✈️47.1K Telegram creators 𝕏30.9K X creators 🎵15.2K TikTok creators 🎮5.1K Discord creators 🎬3.1K Rumble creators 🧵1.2K Threads creators
ClimateFran

ClimateFran

Bluesky @climatefran.bsky.social
⚔ Compare ☆ Watch Own this channel?
🔄 Data last refreshed 12 days ago
🤝

Make a deal with ClimateFran

🔒 Paid proposals held safely in escrow — released only when the work's approved.

📣Sponsored postOne post with your link and message, clearly disclosed. $117→ 🧵Sponsored threadA 3–5 post storytelling thread — Bluesky rewards substance o… $293→ 📌Pinned sponsored postA sponsored post pinned to the top of my profile for the mon… $351/mo→ 🔗Link-in-bio placementYour link in my bio for the month. $176/mo→ 🔁Repost packageI repost your account's posts through the month — distributi… $234/mo→ ⭐Starter-pack placementYour account included in my starter pack — new users follow … $234/mo→ 🎁Giveaway postYou supply the prize — I run the giveaway post and pick winn… $94→ 📦Product seeding / honest reviewSend me your product — I post a disclosed, honest take. Auth… $140→ 🤝Mutual shoutout collabWe shout each other out — a value swap between accounts. Swap→ 🎬UGC HireBranded content for your own channels & ads from $52→ 🎙️Podcast guest spotInvite ClimateFran onto your podcast (~45 min, remote) $67→

Every booking is a normal escrow-protected deal.

Followers
14.7K
Account age
2 yrs
🧰 Free analysis for ClimateFran
🕵️ Fake follower check 📊 Engagement rate 💰 What they charge

Known for

Things I learned today - language in the Clean Air Act explicitly defines "air pollutant" to include anything with adverse effects on weather and climate www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...112 views Things I learned today - language in the Clean Air Act explicitly defines "air pollutant" to include anything with adverse effects on weather and climate www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/... Was looking at EPA's impact assessment of the GHG powerplant regulation repeal today. Truly Kafkaesque. EPA simply asserts that the costs of the repeal (i.e. higher GHG emissions) are "too uncertain" and therefore the net-benefits of repeal are lower compliance costs www.epa.gov/system/files...34 views Was looking at EPA's impact assessment of the GHG powerplant regulation repeal today. Truly Kafkaesque. EPA simply asserts that the costs of the repeal (i.e. higher GHG emissions) are "too uncertain" and therefore the net-benefits of repeal are lower compliance costs www.epa.gov/system/files... Experts attribute the perceived downward bias in published SCCs to a range of factors. Discounting parameters, underestimated damages, under-representation of growth rate damages, and limited substitutability of climate impacts with consumption are notable.8 views Experts attribute the perceived downward bias in published SCCs to a range of factors. Discounting parameters, underestimated damages, under-representation of growth rate damages, and limited substitutability of climate impacts with consumption are notable. The vast majority of respondents believe published SCC values to be downward biased. The average "best-guess" SCC ($142 per ton CO2) is more than twice their literature estimate ($60 per ton). Experts substantially underestimate published SCC, at least compared to our findings.8 views The vast majority of respondents believe published SCC values to be downward biased. The average "best-guess" SCC ($142 per ton CO2) is more than twice their literature estimate ($60 per ton). Experts substantially underestimate published SCC, at least compared to our findings.

📊 Post engagement

18
Avg engagement / post
0.1%
Engagement vs followers
Aug 2023
On Bluesky since

🔥 Top post: Things I learned today - language in the Clean Air Act explicitl · 112 likes + reposts

📊 Activity & format

Posting cadence
0.2 / week
A lower-frequency account — each post lands with more weight.
Content mix
Mostly images
Recent: 0 text · 12 image · 0 video.

Recent posts

View on Bluesky ↗
🔥 Top post Things I learned today - language in the Clean Air Act explicitly defines "air pollutant" to include anything with adverse effects on weather and climate www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/... ★ 112
Hi Neighbor! Also @sidersadapts.bsky.social @envpolicycenter.bsky.social @andrewdessler.com ★ 2 Check out our paper on ecological costs of climate change - we have a three (!) good utility function . Not unheard of in economics. www.nature.com/articles/s41... ★ 2 Was looking at EPA's impact assessment of the GHG powerplant regulation repeal today. Truly Kafkaesque. EPA simply asserts that the costs of the repeal (i.e. higher GHG emissions) are "too uncertain" and therefore the net-benefits of repea… ★ 34 The paper walks through a simple illustration using an information spectrum constructed from a forced Lorenz model and two different decision contexts - a short-term "insurance decision" and a long-term "infrastructure decision" We propose operationalizing VOI for climate risk using an information spectrum, that places different information states on a continuum from simple to complex. The value of different information states can be evaluated relative to each oth… A VOI approach provides a broad framework for quantifying the value of new climate information to a particular decision-maker. Essentially it boils down to the change in the expected value of the decision made under the new vs the old clim… ★ 1 This "Synthetic SCC" distribution integrates both parametric and structural uncertainties. Our 2020 SCC distribution has a median of $185 per ton CO2, a mean of $283 and a 95th percentile of $874 - higher than the large majority of governm… ★ 5 This procedure is essentially a structured re-weighting of the 1823 SCC distributions from the literature. Papers integrating elements that are relatively under-sampled compared to expert assessment and that contribute meaningfully to SCC … ★ 5 We also ask experts about their confidence in studies using different model structures to estimate the SCC. Translating responses into probabilities, we see a substantial under-sampling of these alternate structures in the published litera… ★ 4 Experts attribute the perceived downward bias in published SCCs to a range of factors. Discounting parameters, underestimated damages, under-representation of growth rate damages, and limited substitutability of climate impacts with consum… ★ 8 The vast majority of respondents believe published SCC values to be downward biased. The average "best-guess" SCC ($142 per ton CO2) is more than twice their literature estimate ($60 per ton). Experts substantially underestimate published … ★ 8

🦋 Handle & authenticity

Bluesky handle
@climatefran.bsky.social
A default .bsky.social handle — genuine, but not domain-verified. Confirm identity before a high-value deal.
On Bluesky since
Aug 2023
An early adopter from the invite-only beta (before the Feb 2024 public launch) — an original, established account.

💡 Facts

🗓️Joined Bluesky in 2023 — 2 years ago.
👁️Averages 18 views per post.
📤Posts about 0.2× per week.
🏅Earned the 10K Followers for passing 10K followers.

🕵️ Fake follower check

Estimated
40/100
Low Credibility score
68%
Mixed Real audience
Medium Fake-follower risk
Medium Data confidence
  • Est. 68% real, active audience · Medium fake-follower risk.
  • Low engagement (~0.1% of followers engage each post) — a sign of an inflated or inactive audience.

Heuristic estimate from engagement, follower ratios, account age & growth — a screening signal, not a guarantee.

About

professor @UCDavis | climate change economist / scientist / general nerd | White House CEA 2022-23 https://franmoore.faculty.ucdavis.edu/

📸 Gallery

Things I learned today - language in the Clean Air Act explicitly defines "air pollutant" to include anything with adverse effects on weather and climate www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/... Hi Neighbor! Also @sidersadapts.bsky.social @envpolicycenter.bsky.social @andrewdessler.com Check out our paper on ecological costs of climate change - we have a three (!) good utility function . Not unheard of in economics. www.nature.com/articles/s41... Was looking at EPA's impact assessment of the GHG powerplant regulation repeal today. Truly Kafkaesque. EPA simply asserts that the costs of the repeal (i.e. higher GHG emissions) are "too uncertain" and therefore the net-benefits of repeal are lower compliance costs www.epa.gov/system/files... The paper walks through a simple illustration using an information spectrum constructed from a forced Lorenz model and two different decision contexts - a short-term "insurance decision" and a long-term "infrastructure decision" We propose operationalizing VOI for climate risk using an information spectrum, that places different information states on a continuum from simple to complex. The value of different information states can be evaluated relative to each other. (But not relative to "truth", which is unknowable) A VOI approach provides a broad framework for quantifying the value of new climate information to a particular decision-maker. Essentially it boils down to the change in the expected value of the decision made under the new vs the old climate information This "Synthetic SCC" distribution integrates both parametric and structural uncertainties. Our 2020 SCC distribution has a median of $185 per ton CO2, a mean of $283 and a 95th percentile of $874 - higher than the large majority of government estimates

🔀 Audience overlap

Estimated

Estimated shared audience with similar creators — useful for avoiding overlap (or doubling down) when planning a campaign.

Ray Ray 15% Calista Melissa Calista Melissa 14% CaroleOntheGo🇨🇦 CaroleOntheGo🇨🇦 14% Dr. Marissa Civic Dr. Marissa Civic 13% Scott Swaim Scott Swaim 11% mitch2266.bsky.social mitch2266.bsky.social 10%

More like this

Find more →
Bluesky
Calista Melissa
Calista Melissa
@calistamelissa.bsky.social
14.7K Followers
Bluesky
Dr. Marissa Civic
Dr. Marissa Civic
@stemfactually.com
14.7K Followers
Bluesky
Scott Swaim
Scott Swaim
@scottswaim5.bsky.social
14.7K Followers
Bluesky
CaroleOntheGo🇨🇦
CaroleOntheGo🇨🇦
@caroleonthego4u.bsky.social
14.7K Followers
Bluesky
mitch2266.bsky.social
mitch2266.bsky.social
@mitch2266.bsky.social
14.7K Followers
Bluesky
Ray
Ray
@raycreation.ca
14.6K Followers

✉ Message ClimateFran

Reaching out to influencers is a Pro feature. Upgrade to message any influencer directly — perfect for brands and agencies booking sponsorships.

  • ✓ Message any influencer from their listing
  • ✓ The influencer gets notified by email
  • ✓ Manage every conversation in one inbox
See Pro $9.95/mo →

Already Pro? Log in.

🎤 Event / appearance with ClimateFran

Booking an event / appearance is a Pro feature. Upgrade to book ClimateFran for an in-person or virtual appearance — payment held safely in escrow until the event is done.

  • ✓ Book them for events, livestreams, panels & more
  • ✓ ClimateFran gets notified by email
  • ✓ Fee held in escrow, released after the appearance
See Pro $9.95/mo →

Already Pro? Log in.