LIVE
6.7M influencer listings 🏢78K sponsor listings 🌍92.3B combined audience reach 📊13 platforms indexed 🗺️130+ countries covered 🏷️10,000+ niches 🦋2.9M Bluesky creators 🎙️1.3M podcast creators 🟣1.1M Twitch creators 📈387.4K Pinterest creators 🥊212K Kick creators 𝕏201.8K X creators 🐘200.6K Mastodon creators 115.1K YouTube creators 🎵91.6K TikTok creators ✈️84.6K Telegram creators 🎮11.5K Discord creators 🎬4.6K Rumble creators 📈3.8K Substack creators 🧵2.7K Threads creators 6.7M influencer listings 🏢78K sponsor listings 🌍92.3B combined audience reach 📊13 platforms indexed 🗺️130+ countries covered 🏷️10,000+ niches 🦋2.9M Bluesky creators 🎙️1.3M podcast creators 🟣1.1M Twitch creators 📈387.4K Pinterest creators 🥊212K Kick creators 𝕏201.8K X creators 🐘200.6K Mastodon creators 115.1K YouTube creators 🎵91.6K TikTok creators ✈️84.6K Telegram creators 🎮11.5K Discord creators 🎬4.6K Rumble creators 📈3.8K Substack creators 🧵2.7K Threads creators
markhistedphd

markhistedphd Add us as a preferred source on Google

🔄 Data last refreshed 4 days ago
🤝

Make a deal with markhistedphd

🔒 Paid proposals held safely in escrow — released only when the work's approved.

Every booking is a normal escrow-protected deal.

Followers
410
Total likes
3K
Videos
18
Following
50
🎁 Free analysisfor markhistedphd

Known for

No, the budget vote is NOT a reason to think things at NIH will be ok.  Russell Vought and the Project 2025 people in the White House are breaking NIH from the inside. What’s looming: bad NIH institute director hires and changes to peer review. Please share. This is discussing publicly reported facts or it’s my opinion and is free speech protected by the first amendment, because the public has an interest in hearing from experts in government. Edit: yes it was cold outside! But that’s the light 2.4K views No, the budget vote is NOT a reason to think things at NIH will be ok. Russell Vought and the Project 2025 people in the White House are breaking NIH from the inside. What’s looming: bad NIH institute director hires and changes to peer review. Please share. This is discussing publicly reported facts or it’s my opinion and is free speech protected by the first amendment, because the public has an interest in hearing from experts in government. Edit: yes it was cold outside! But that’s the light Bad news out of the Trump NIH. They opened job applications for several Institute Directors. But with a super short deadline, seemingly without the expert search committees that engage the scientific community on these hires. Those expert search committees can prevent the president from installing his cronies. For scientists: so far we have seen grant terminations (illegal grant terminations). But we have not seen many grants awarded for political reasons. But the IC directors have the authority1.7K views Bad news out of the Trump NIH. They opened job applications for several Institute Directors. But with a super short deadline, seemingly without the expert search committees that engage the scientific community on these hires. Those expert search committees can prevent the president from installing his cronies. For scientists: so far we have seen grant terminations (illegal grant terminations). But we have not seen many grants awarded for political reasons. But the IC directors have the authority The Trump CDC is doing junk science. And it helps to see how it does it. And why.  Some things: We are not in the business of proving negatives, what is scientific truth and how does it arise? RFK’s corruption/conflicts of interest. Consensus, merchants of doubt, and money. Don’t be afraid to call out the merchants of doubt. #realisticoptimism #nih #merchantsofdoubt #Science #wearegoingtowinthis @DrSoz @Jenna @public_enlightenment1.6K views The Trump CDC is doing junk science. And it helps to see how it does it. And why. Some things: We are not in the business of proving negatives, what is scientific truth and how does it arise? RFK’s corruption/conflicts of interest. Consensus, merchants of doubt, and money. Don’t be afraid to call out the merchants of doubt. #realisticoptimism #nih #merchantsofdoubt #Science #wearegoingtowinthis @DrSoz @Jenna @public_enlightenment An inspiring part of #NoKings in DC. These two ladies came from their retirement community as part of a group, formed up into buddies, because they thought it was important to be there.1.5K views An inspiring part of #NoKings in DC. These two ladies came from their retirement community as part of a group, formed up into buddies, because they thought it was important to be there.

📊 Engagement & reach

Engagement rate · Excellent
40.73%
Likes + comments ÷ followers. On TikTok this is the real currency — a highly-engaged mid-size creator often out-performs a bigger, passive one.
Avg likes / video
167
Typical likes on a recent post — the clearest proof of how hard the audience reacts.
Avg views / video
1.2K
Measured across recent posts — that’s their follower count, the reach a sponsored video actually earns.
Posting cadence
0.31 / week
A more selective poster — each video gets room to breathe.
Follower / following
8.2×
Follows just 50 back — a lopsided ratio typical of a real creator with a genuine audience, not a follow-for-follow account.

📹 Recent videos

Latest posts straight from markhistedphd's TikTok.

@markhistedphd

💡 Facts

👁️Averages 1.2K views per stream.
📤Posts about 0.3× per week.
💬40.73% engagement rate.

🕵️ Fake follower check

Estimated
92/100
Excellent Credibility score
98%
Real Real audience
Low Fake-follower risk
High Data confidence
  • Est. 98% real, active audience · Low fake-follower risk.
  • Strong engagement (~ of followers engage each post) — an active, real audience.
  • 40.73% engagement — above the ~15% typical for a TikTok account this size.

Heuristic estimate from engagement, follower ratios, account age & growth — a screening signal, not a guarantee.

About

Neuroscientist. Aim to understand diffs in 🧠 wiring using lasers and neuro/AI. Pers. views;not a lab acct. Free speech. linktr.ee/markhisted

📸 Gallery

Recent content

300k comments in, now zoom out to the far-right fringe that originated this rule. Which includes John Roberts. Win elections, and then we need a plan for 2029: strengthen Congress, reform the Supreme Court, save biomedical research, and dementia and cancer treatments. Thanks to everyone who organized including @standupforscience and everyone who commented. #nih #realisticoptimism #freespeech #neuroscience
1.3K views · 2 months ago
An inspiring part of #NoKings in DC. These two ladies came from their retirement community as part of a group, formed up into buddies, because they thought it was important to be there.
1.5K views · 5 months ago
The farewell to Cosyne 2026. We didn’t have a mike or a podium, but like all scientists we were ready to improvise with chairs and loud voices. Congrats to Guillaume Lajoie and Alex Cayco Gajic for a great workshop program, and thanks to all the scientists who came, participated, spoke, and exchanged ideas. See you next year for Cosyne 2027– the comp neuro and brain research conference. It’s a great community and I always learn a lot. #cosyne #science #neuroscience #AI @cosynemeeting
304 views · 5 months ago
No, the budget vote is NOT a reason to think things at NIH will be ok. Russell Vought and the Project 2025 people in the White House are breaking NIH from the inside. What’s looming: bad NIH institute director hires and changes to peer review. Please share. This is discussing publicly reported facts or it’s my opinion and is free speech protected by the first amendment, because the public has an interest in hearing from experts in government. Edit: yes it was cold outside! But that’s the light
2.4K views · 8 months ago
Part 2/2 Pinching puppies! The reasons for health misinformation can seem complicated. But there’s an amazing kids book that explains this in simple terms. It also covers why there is an attack on science happening. Everything I say here has either been reported publicly or is my opinion, and I speak in my personal capacity on personal time. So this is #freespeech protected by the First Amendment (ex: Thurgood Marshall in Pickering v Board, 1968). #nih #realisticoptimism #science #media Full v
359 views · 9 months ago
Pinching puppies! The reasons for health misinformation can seem complicated. But there’s an amazing kids book that explains this in simple terms. It also covers why there is an attack on science happening. Everything I say here has either been reported publicly or is my opinion, and I speak in my personal capacity on personal time. So this is #freespeech protected by the First Amendment (ex: Thurgood Marshall in Pickering v Board, 1968). #nih #realisticoptimism #science #media PART 1 of 2. Fu
626 views · 9 months ago
One thing that makes science— cancer research, cell biology, neuroscience— powerful is that we rely on the scientific community to act as advisors. People offer up their expertise, listen to others’ talks, serve on committees. We put our minds together and share expertise. But it’s not just science! Watch for another example. Speak out, call your Congress members and tell them we want NIH institute directors hired with real search committees. #nih #realisticoptimism #talent #innovation
1.1K views · 9 months ago
Trump’s ongoing destruction of cancer research by blowing up NIH from inside. This one is about institute directors and one thing we can do. Scientists, please share with your colleagues. More info in other reels and in bio. The massive changes inside NIH to move towards conservative politics and away from real science are reportedly led by Russell Vought, the shadow president and Project 2025 co-lead. As always speaking here in my personal capacity on personal time about matters of public conce
1.3K views · 9 months ago
We — scientists who are speaking out — get this question all the time. Why are they coming after scientists? So a short summary. For more see the longer video, reel in profile and links in bio. Similar things have happened for climate, and asbestos, and vaccines. But this administration is doing a super-charged attack on science. Attacking truth isn’t the only reason: privatization and electoral sorting is part of it too. Karl Rove, Russell Vought, and Charles Koch are all part of the answe
1.3K views · 9 months ago
The Trump CDC is doing junk science. And it helps to see how it does it. And why. Some things: We are not in the business of proving negatives, what is scientific truth and how does it arise? RFK’s corruption/conflicts of interest. Consensus, merchants of doubt, and money. Don’t be afraid to call out the merchants of doubt. #realisticoptimism #nih #merchantsofdoubt #Science #wearegoingtowinthis @DrSoz @Jenna @public_enlightenment
1.6K views · 9 months ago
Bad news out of the Trump NIH. They opened job applications for several Institute Directors. But with a super short deadline, seemingly without the expert search committees that engage the scientific community on these hires. Those expert search committees can prevent the president from installing his cronies. For scientists: so far we have seen grant terminations (illegal grant terminations). But we have not seen many grants awarded for political reasons. But the IC directors have the authority
1.7K views · 10 months ago
1.3K views · 10 months ago

Frequently asked questions

How much does markhistedphd charge for a sponsorship?
markhistedphd hasn't published fixed prices yet. Send a proposal through SocialDB and agree terms directly — your payment is held in escrow until the work is approved.
How do I contact markhistedphd for a brand deal or collaboration?
Send a paid deal or collab request right here on SocialDB — we notify markhistedphd, and once they accept, your payment is held safely in escrow and released when the work is approved. You don't need to track down an email.
How many followers does markhistedphd have?
markhistedphd has 410 followers on TikTok.

✉ Message markhistedphd

Reaching out to influencers is a Pro feature. Upgrade to message any influencer directly — perfect for brands and agencies booking sponsorships.

See Pro $9.95/mo →

Already Pro? Log in.

🎤 Event / appearance with markhistedphd

Booking an event / appearance is a Pro feature. Upgrade to book markhistedphd for an in-person or virtual appearance — payment held safely in escrow until the event is done.

See Pro $9.95/mo →

Already Pro? Log in.

Auto-generated from TikTok's public data — no affiliation with or endorsement by SocialDB. Is this you? Claim it · Remove

✉️ Contact